Good Sexy, Bad Sexy

Come to think of it, this post is going to cover the same ground as something I did years ago, when I was just a little baby blogger.  Just, saying it now in a different way.  So consider this the HD Remix of one of my most popular for probably the wrong reasons seminal posts of why and in what situations sexiness can be good.

Sexuality is awesome, isn’t it?  It grabs people at a very instinctual, emotional level, it brings people together, and makes us feel whole.  It makes us healthier physically and mentally, it gives us drive and energy, and it feels so innate to us that most consider it a significant part of our identity and our society has adopted a rather complex set of cultural practices surrounding sexuality.  It likely comes as no surprise, coming from the world’s sexiest man as determined by a survey of myself and my mirror, but to me, sexuality is a marvelous thing to be celebrating.

Media producers often work sexuality or titillation into the works they’re producing.  This is not a new phenomenon, it’s been going on for hundreds of years.  Just think back to all those classical paintings you spent way too long staring at back in middle school.  And it’s no wonder why.  We’ve got an instinctual draw for it, and it’ll capture or attention in a way that little else will.  And it works on an instinctual level, just like we react to the simulated intensity of danger or the fear of horror, so too do we get a thrill from sexiness when it’s coming through our screens, canvas, or pages.  And in contrast to what many may say, I’d posit that that’s a good thing that we can get that hook in us when we wish.

Which makes me wonder why so many creators get it so wrong.

Recently I was playing Oneechanbara: Bikini Zombie Slayers, which is part of a strange and eclectic collection I call “Games I own because of the women I’ve dated”.  Which also includes the first three games of the Hitman series, Onimusha, Final Fantasy VII Dirge of Cerberus, Dynasty Warriors III, the entire Fable series, Syberia II, the Wii version of Oregon Trail, and the absolute bane of my existence, Fur Fighters.  I’m coming to realize that my ladyfriends have some really mixed tastes.  Not sure what that says about me.  Anyways, in this case, as you can probably tell by the title, this is a total fanservice game.  It exists to put scantily clad women in front of you.  And yet I found the sexuality there really wasn’t working for me.  It’s kind of a middling game without it, yet the sexiness, I found, actually dragged the experience down.  I was wondering about that.  I’ve played a lot of other games where I enjoyed the sexuality there or felt it actually uplifted the experience.  And it got me thinking back to what made the difference there.

And that got me thinking back to that post I mentioned above.  And, you know, almost six years later, I still stand by that post.  I occasionally look back over my old writings and find something I may not agree perfectly with now, but that one, that still holds up completely.  But the thought still remains in my mind, of the differences between the works that do their sexuality right and those that don’t.  And I’d like to explore that here, today.  I’m not going to walk in my own footprints and re-make those same statements I did years ago, so check that post if you’d like some background on this whole deal.  But I would like to delve into that concept again.  This time, let’s take a look at how it works specifically, comparing and contrasting a few examples.

933210-943440_20090217_001.jpg

With Oneechanbara: Bikini Zombie Slayers, you know what you’re getting.  It’s right there in the title.  You get young women in various types of revealing clothes slaughtering hordes of zombies.  Where’s the problem with that?  For me, I was feeling a pretty strong dissonance between the game’s visually sexual content and the fact that it played its plot and setting, such as it was, way too straight.  Outside of the design of the main characters, it had absolutely no levity to it.  It’s all grim, dark, grindhouse-inspired plot dealing with conspiracies and and curses and everything always getting worse forever.  Hell, one of the game’s leads goes on and on between levels about how tortured she is, how her blood has locked her into a never ending conflict and she’s always on the verge of losing control and she has to watch as the only person she loves is dragged unwillingly into this as well.  Which is all well and good.  Except she’s dressed like this.

BZSaya.jpg

Which is not to say that sexy people don’t go through some trauma.  Trust me, I know this very well.  But a character’s visual design communicates things about them.  And there is absolutely nothing about that character that communicates that she is deeply unhappy and feels torn apart by the strange turns her life has taken her on, at her core.  And yet the visual design, the overt cheesecake there, is completely unsupported by the rest of the game.  The lead characters almost seem like they were transplanted to this game from a completely different project.  It’s trying to have it two ways, and not really getting either out of it.  The game’s world or plot does not exude any sense of happiness or fun at any moment, with which we can properly get into the feel for fanservice times.  At the same time, the sexy character designs end up distracting and detracting from the gritty story of personal torment that it’s trying to tell.  I mean, not that it tries very hard.  But still, the parts of the game don’t match up.  Not saying you can’t have a a dark story alongside sexy characters, but there has to be some kind of connecting thread in between them, else the parts will fight against each other.

bayonetta-devushka-pistolety.jpg

Let’s take a look at the flip side of that coin.  Bayonetta.  The game is absolutely in-your-face sexual.  Your lead playable character is also ludicrously dressed.  And, just like in Onechanbara, you’re mostly fighting freakish monsters that wouldn’t be out of place in horror games.  And yet it Bayonetta makes it work.  So what’s the difference there?  Well, one is that Bayonetta’s gameworld is one in which this sexuality fits.  It’s a place that can have its serious moments, but it’s otherwise just full of fun.  Sexuality needs levity to hit home, and Bayonetta allows for that in spades.  And even as ludicrous as its sexuality is, it goes to the extremes in other areas as well, so the degrees don’t feel out of place either.  Bayonetta’s character also perfectly embodies her visual design.  She absolutely revels in her sexuality, she takes very little seriously, and she’s constantly pushing things to the extremes while being absolutely casual about it.  And she doesn’t do so as a show, either, that just seems to be who she’s most comfortable being.  And it really helps that it seems to have a place within the game world, too.  Outside of the other otherworldly beings that were also part of Bayonetta’s culture, all the normies absolutely don’t seem to know what to make of her.  She’s just as bizarre to them as she would be if she showed up in our world.

hqdefault (5).jpg

So let’s talk the Witcher.  Which has an interesting take on this, going farther with its sexuality than most games would.  Geralt, much as he does in the original novels, has a lot of sex.  When you court a partner, you go for the classic fade to black cutaway just as things are getting steamy, only for that to be interrupted with a rather intricately painted picture of what they look like naked.  You following along so far?  Good.  Now, I’m not going to say that you can’t make something like this work out.  But the Witcher doesn’t do it that smoothly.  For one, in contrast to the cold, reserved, confident individual he is the rest of the game, Geralt’s dialogue and delivery often turn him into a bit of a bumbling dweeb when he’s trying to intimate himself with someone.  So the out-of-characterness is a bit off putting already.  But there’s typically very little development or build up for it, and the stark transitions between normal gameplay to weird romance characterization to completely different art-style romance card makes it feel a bit immersion breaking.  It doesn’t help that the reward I was looking for there was a bit different than Geralt’s goals, moreover separating myself from the character.  In a lot of ways, the sex scenes there feel really tacked on, a last minute addition made by a different party to what was already a full adventure story with everything you’d expect.  On top of that, while I have often wondered what a certain character looks like naked and may be convinced to push for more games following suit, not everyone wants to be confronted with full nudity in a game that’s known and designed for so much else, where you’re not really given to expect it until it’s already in front of you.  It could be rightfully off-putting to plenty of parties that would love everything else from the game.

maxresdefault (3).jpg

On the other side of that, let’s take a look at Katawa Shojo.  Using this picture because it’s one of the few SF-This Site pictures I can find that vaguely gets the point across.  It’s an H-Game, so you know what you’re getting into with it already, although you can just turn the porn off if that’s where your sensitivities lead you.  But the sex scenes there flow a lot better.  They come with a long build up and work themselves strongly into the plot, wherein the sex scenes typically include events and activities that actively move it forward.  Given that they do fit the design of the rest of the game, they keep the immersion really intact, and they have a lot of impact on later events.  Katawa Shojo has a really heavy plot, and it’s one that wouldn’t be the same without this type of character interaction taking place.

4160216-mortal-kombat-armageddon.jpg

Then there’s Mortal Kombat.  Which has its sexual appeal spewed haphazardly all over the place.  Most of the women are of modelesque proportions and scantily clad.  Half the men weigh 230 pounds with 9% body fat and come from cultures where shirts were never invented.  And frankly, it gets stale.  Because they all look the same, body-shape wise.  It’s at the point where the fully dressed characters are far more visually interesting, because there’s no variety there to keep things fresh and the sexy character just stop at that point.  “Make them sexy” was the entirety of their design concept, and it just stops there.  Given how few of the women were given anything beyond that, it really makes it difficult for them to stand out.

maxresdefault (1).jpg

Let’s compare that with Guilty Gear’s cast of characters.  That series has some incredibly far out there designs.  A lot of them are very oversexed.  But they’ve all got more going on then just “show some skin”.  And the design of the thinly dressed characters takes as many features and flairs on as those that are completely covered, enabling them to stand par with everyone else.  Showing skin is a part of the design, not all of it.  It helps that they keep the genders on a rough par as far as how exposed they make them, too.  You got I-no and her barely there shirt on the women’s side, you got Testament wearing a skirt and not much else for the men.  You have bad-ass big-titted Baiken crushing your foes for you, you get Zato-1 fighting with his painted on clothes.  And you get a lot of variety too, which helps keep all of it fresh.  You have characters more classically dressed.  You have characters looking absolutely crazy.  And everything in between.  Point is, the sexuality of this game is drawn into its art style, and makes part of a complete whole.  It sells the whole experience a lot better, and works in service to the characters much more.

There.  I don’t have a cool way to close this out, but that’s my piece, I’ve said it, so let’s all get to enjoying the good sexy in our games and other media.  And let’s also take a moment to acknowledge all the folks who are going to mistakenly find this post in internet searches hoping for other things entirely.  Thanks for sticking with it this far, friends.

 

 

8 responses to “Good Sexy, Bad Sexy

    • I had thought I would go the rest of my life without ever running into another person that has play Fur Fighters. My deepest, dearest condolences for that dark part of your life.

      Yeah, I would highly recommend Bayonetta. It’s way over the top in just about every way possible, but it turns that into something great.

  1. This is pretty much how I feel as well. I have no problem with plenty of sexuality in a game, and even with fanservice, but it has to fit the game’s tone. That’s not to say you can’t tell a serious story with that kind of material. I haven’t played Katawa Shoujo, but it seems like one of those VNs that takes time to build believable characters and relationships.

    There are also “sexy” art styles some people like that will never work for me, but that’s more of a personal thing.

    • Yeah, tone really is key for this sorts of things. And yeah, that hits Katawa Shoujo on the head. The game takes its time intimating you with its characters, and has a rather lengthy story arc for each.

  2. You make a lot of very good points here, and I agree to a point (e.g., revealing armor in fantasy games that are not obviously over-the-top irritates me). However, sexuality is part of the human experience (for most people, I imagine), so of course it will be reflected in visual arts and literature and games and all the rest. For example, in Dragon Age: Origins (of course), there are desire demons, who are scantily-clad women with tassels covering the least amount of boobage possible, which in context makes sense. A male desire demon (should one exist) would also be showing off as many features as possible, I imagine. On the other hand is scantily-clad Quiet from MGS5 breathing through her skin, and oops oh darn she can’t wear clothes.

    To be fair, I’d have been more okay with Quiet if there was no in-game reason, because it felt like my intelligence was being mocked. And maybe that’s part of what makes Bad Sexy… well, Bad Sexy. There’s no believable reason for it, but you need to buy into it because the game said so.

    As an aside, I didn’t know about the card thing in the Witcher…. I just… Naked women as collectibles. That’s all I could think of when I read that. And I’m… speechless.

    At any rate, really great article and I love how you broke down the difference between Good Sexy and Bad Sexy in games, because there is a difference!

    • I almost used Dragon Age as an example here. Fun thing about it is that it doesn’t shy away from the sexual content when it’s appropriate, as seen with the desire demons you mentioned, or Morrigan’s default dress, which does rather fit her character. But it also eschews it rather freely and appropriately as well. Leliana being generally dressed as revealing as Morrigan was absolutely wouldn’t make sense with her character, and it’s one of the few games that gets woman’s heavy armor largely logistically accurate, without trying to make them too accurate.

      I haven’t played MGS5 yet, but everything I’ve heard about her is absolutely ridiculous. Metal Gear has some really far-fetched fictional science, but that breaks with even everything they had established up to that point. And she’s not even an interesting-looking character, at that. Sniper Wolf’s mega cleavage didn’t make much sense for a seemingly asexual character, but she still has way more allure to her than Quiet, even with way more clothes.

      Yeah, the Witcher features porn as collectables. I think it would be a good idea to have the option to turn that off or switch for the censored version, just to make it more palatable to those whose interests don’t fly that way, but, it is what it is. It’s probably a good idea that later games got rid of those, especially as the series does seem to have a pretty large female playerbase, although I do seem to amass a decently large collection whenever I run through the original, so I can’t say I’m not being hypocritical there. If it just handled it with a lot more tact, and maybe considered that not everyone jumping on the game would be into that… I don’t know. I’m rambling.

  3. Pingback: Listening/reading log #5 (February 2020) | Everything is bad for you

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s